Akers v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Filing 63

ORDER granting 62 Motion to Extend Deadline for Disclosing Experts. Complete expert disclosures for all parties due March 15, 2012. Rebuttal expert disclosures due April 16, 2012. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (BHC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA DONNA L. AKERS, Plaintiff, V. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKALINCOLN, TIMOTHY CLARE, individually and in his capacity as a voting member of the Board of Regents, RANDOLPH FERLIC, individually and in his capacity as a voting member of the Board of Regents, CHUCK HASSEBROOK, individually and in his capacity as a voting member of the Board of Regents, HOWARD HAWKS, individually and in his capacity as a voting member of the Board of Regents, JIM MCCLURG, individually and in his capacity as a voting member of the Board of Regents, BOB PHERES, individually and in his capacity as a voting member of the Board of Regents, KENT SCHRODER, individually and in his capacity as a voting member of the Board of Regents, and BOB WHITEHOUSE, individually and in his capacity as a voting member of the Board of Regents, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:10CV3247 ORDER The parties’ Joint Motion to Extend Deadline for Disclosing Experts, (filing no. 62) is granted. IT IS ORDERED: 1) The deadlines for disclosure of experts and, unless otherwise agreed, the deadline for complete expert disclosures, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained experts, (Fed. R.Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), are: Experts for all parties: Rebuttal experts for all parties: 2) March 15, 2012. April 16, 2012. All other deadlines set forth in the Order Setting Final Schedule for Progression of a Civil Case, (filing no. 54), remain the same. DATED this 16th day of February, 2012. BY THE COURT: S/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?