Akers v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln
AMENDED PROGREESSION ORDER granting 68 Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines. Deadlines extended as stated. All other dates in the Court's Order setting Final Schedule for Progression of Case (Filing 54 ) shall remain the same. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DONNA L. AKERS,
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKALINCOLN, et. al.,
AMENDED PROGRESSION ORDER
The Joint Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines and Progression of Case (Filing 68) is
IT IS ORDERED:
The deadline for filing motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment is
July 13, 2012.
All depositions, whether or not they are intended to be used at trial, shall be
completed by June 22, 2012.
All interrogatories, requests for admission and request for production or inspection,
whether or not they are intended to be used for trial, shall be served sufficiently
early to allow rule time response before the deposition deadline. Counsel may
stipulate to extension of time to respond to discovery requests in accordance with
Fed. R. Civ. P. 29, but such extensions shall not extend any of the dates in this
order; any request to extend the deadlines of this order shall be sought by motion.
Motions in limine challenging the admissibility of expert testimony at trial under
Fed. R. Evid. 702, see Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. V. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999),
and Daubert v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993), shall be filed
by July 13, 2012 and accompanied by a request for a hearing if necessary. Failure
to timely move for a hearing may constitute waiver of the request for a hearing.
All other dates in the Court's Order setting Final Schedule for Progression of Case
(Filing 54) shall remain the same.
DATED this 2nd day of May, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?