Thomas v. Social Security Administration
Filing
17
CONSENT ORDER that if the parties consent to final disposition of the case by the undersigned magistrate judge, on or before June13, 2011, they shall complete the attached "CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. " After all parties have signed this form, e-mail it in.pdf format to clerk@ned.uscourts.gov. Do not electronically file this form or submit it to chambers. In the absence of timely submitting the attached form in accordance with paragraph (1), the case will be reassigned to a district judge. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (ADB, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
NICHOLE L. THOMAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner
of the Social Security Administration,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
4:10CV3250
CONSENT ORDER
The above-captioned action has been randomly assigned to the undersigned
magistrate judge for final disposition, and a scheduling order has been entered for resolution
by cross-motions for summary judgment. However, the case cannot be ruled on by the
assigned magistrate judge unless both parties consent to final disposition by a magistrate
judge. If the parties do not so consent, the case will be reassigned to a district judge.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that to avoid any delay in ruling on this case,
1)
If the parties consent to final disposition of the case by the undersigned
magistrate judge, on or before June13, 2011, they shall complete the attached
“CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE.” After all parties have signed this form, e-mail it in
.pdf format to clerk@ned.uscourts.gov. Do not electronically file this form or
submit it to chambers.
2)
In the absence of timely submitting the attached form in accordance with
paragraph (1), the case will be reassigned to a district judge.
May 13, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
IMPORTANT NOTICE: AFTER ALL PARTIES HAVE SIGNED THIS FORM, E-MAIL IT IN .PDF
TO clerk@ned.uscourts.gov. IF PLAINTIFF IS PRO SE, MAIL TO THE CLERK’S OFFICE AT 111
South 18th Plaza, Suite 1152, Omaha, NE 68102. DO NOT ELECTRONICALLY FILE THIS FORM
OR SUBMIT IT TO CHAMBERS.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
,
Plaintiff,
v.
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case Number:
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION
BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, the parties in this case hereby
voluntarily consent to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case,
including the trial, and order the entry of a final judgment. Any appeal shall be taken to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Signature of Attorney or Party
Name of Party
Date
_______________________________
For_________________________
______________________
_______________________________
For_________________________
______________________
_______________________________
For_________________________
______________________
______________________________
For_________________________
______________________
DISTRICT JUDGE OPTION
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(2) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, the parties in this case hereby acknowledge the
availability of a United States Magistrate Judge but elect to have this case randomly assigned to a United States
District Judge.
Signature of Attorney or Party
Name of Party
2
Date
_______________________________
For_________________________
______________________
_______________________________
For_________________________
______________________
_______________________________
For_________________________
______________________
______________________________
For_________________________
3
______________________
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?