De La Cerda v. Astrue
Filing
20
ORDER granting 19 Plaintiff's Motion to continue regarding ORDER setting briefing schedule 16 . Parties disagree on whether the filed administrative record is complete. If the dispute over the administrative record is not resolved by June 6, 2 011, the plaintiff shall present the issue to the court for resolution, with defendant having fourteen days thereafter to respond, and plaintiff having seven days to reply. If the parties resolve their dispute over the administrative record by June 6 , 2011: a. The plaintiff shall file his initial brief by July 6, 2001; b. The government shall file its responsive brief by August 5, 2011; and c. Any reply by the plaintiff shall be filed on or before August 19, 2011. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ARTURO DE LA CERDA,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
4:10CV3252
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Based on the plaintiff’s motion (filing no. 19), the parties disagree on whether the filed
administrative record is complete, and they are attempting to resolve that dispute before briefing the case
for final resolution.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1)
The plaintiff’s unopposed motion to continue, (filing no. 19), is granted.
2)
If the dispute over the administrative record is not resolved by June 6, 2011, the
plaintiff shall present the issue to the court for resolution, with defendant having
fourteen days thereafter to respond, and plaintiff having seven days to reply.
3)
If the parties resolve their dispute over the administrative record by June 6, 2011:
a.
The plaintiff shall file his initial brief by July 6, 2001;
b.
The government shall file its responsive brief by August 5, 2011; and
c.
Any reply by the plaintiff shall be filed on or before August 19, 2011.
DATED this 11th day of May, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?