Brecek and Young Advisors, Inc. v. Syndicate 2003, Lloyd's of London et al
Filing
71
ORDER granting 70 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. The defendants shall on or before August 27, 2012, file and serve its response brief and index of evidence to plaintiffs motion for summary judgment; and the plaintiff may file and serve its reply brief and index of evidence within 7 days after the defendants files and serves its opposing brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (EJL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
BRECEK AND YOUNG ADVISORS,
INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
SYNDICATE 2003, LLOYD’S OF
LONDON, and CATLIN SPECIALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
4:11CV3003
ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
The defendants have moved for an order extending by 30 days the deadline for them to
respond to the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and provided reasons for the request. (ECF
No. 70). The motion alleges that the plaintiff has agreed to a 21-day extension. Trial is scheduled
to begin on April 15, 2013, in approximately 265 days. The nine-day difference between the
defendants’ requested extension and the plaintiff’s agreed-to 21-day extension does not appear to
adversely impact the start of the trial.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that:
1.
the Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
Judgment, ECF No. 70, is granted;
2.
the defendants shall on or before August 27, 2012, file and serve its response brief
and index of evidence to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment; and
3.
the plaintiff may file and serve its reply brief and index of evidence within 7 days
after the defendants’ files and serves its opposing brief.
Dated July 24, 2012.
BY THE COURT
____________________________________________
Warren K. Urbom
United States Senior District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?