Brecek and Young Advisors, Inc. v. Syndicate 2003, Lloyd's of London et al

Filing 71

ORDER granting 70 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. The defendants shall on or before August 27, 2012, file and serve its response brief and index of evidence to plaintiffs motion for summary judgment; and the plaintiff may file and serve its reply brief and index of evidence within 7 days after the defendants files and serves its opposing brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (EJL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA BRECEK AND YOUNG ADVISORS, INC., Plaintiff, v. SYNDICATE 2003, LLOYD’S OF LONDON, and CATLIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:11CV3003 ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The defendants have moved for an order extending by 30 days the deadline for them to respond to the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and provided reasons for the request. (ECF No. 70). The motion alleges that the plaintiff has agreed to a 21-day extension. Trial is scheduled to begin on April 15, 2013, in approximately 265 days. The nine-day difference between the defendants’ requested extension and the plaintiff’s agreed-to 21-day extension does not appear to adversely impact the start of the trial. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that: 1. the Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 70, is granted; 2. the defendants shall on or before August 27, 2012, file and serve its response brief and index of evidence to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment; and 3. the plaintiff may file and serve its reply brief and index of evidence within 7 days after the defendants’ files and serves its opposing brief. Dated July 24, 2012. BY THE COURT ____________________________________________ Warren K. Urbom United States Senior District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?