Payne v. Britten et al

Filing 112

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that on or before the close of business on Friday, October 24, 2014, counsel for the defendants shall advise the undersigned as to the questions set forth in the following paragraphs: (1) Will the defendants voluntarily produ ce to the plaintiff and file in the court file the several pieces of Paynes mail, both incoming and outgoing, that have been held pending criminal investigation since October 13, 2010? (2) Do the defendants intend to file a motion for summary judgment? Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA CHRISTOPHER M. PAYNE, Plaintiff, vs. FRED BRITTEN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:11CV3017 ORDER I am considering whether to appoint counsel. I am also considering whether to issue a progression order. It would be helpful if I had advice from counsel for the remaining defendants. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that on or before the close of business on Friday, October 24, 2014, counsel for the defendants shall advise the undersigned as to the questions set forth in the following paragraphs: (1) Will the defendants voluntarily produce to the plaintiff and file in the court file the several pieces of Payne’s mail, both incoming and outgoing, that have been held “pending criminal investigation” since October 13, 2010? (2) Do the defendants intend to file a motion for summary judgment? Dated October 10, 2014. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?