Payne v. Britten et al
Filing
143
ORDER regarding Motion for Summary Judgment filing 132 . Counsel for the Plaintiff and the Defendants shall meet and confer regarding all withheld mail that is handwritten. With regard to the withheld mail that is handwritten, the Plaintiff and the Defendants shall prepare and submit an agreed typewritten version of the mail, separately identifying each piece of mail by reference to an exhibit number. The parties shall have until July 2, 2015 to complete this task. The responses required by this order shall be filed as restricted documents. Counsel for the Plaintiff shall not make the contents available to the Plaintiff. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
CHRISTOPHER M. PAYNE,
Plaintiff,
V.
FRED BRITTEN, CHRISTOPHER
CONNELLY, MICHELLE
HILLMAN, LEE TINKLER,
MAILROOM PERSON 1,
MAILROOM PERSON 2, ET. AL.,
BENNY NOORDHOEK, CARINA
MCROBERTS, and J KUNZMAN,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
4:11CV3017
ORDER
I am reviewing the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (filing 132) and
the evidence. I have a problem in that some of the exhibits are unreadable.
IT IS ORDERED that:
(1) Counsel for the Plaintiff and the Defendants shall meet and confer
regarding all withheld mail that is handwritten.
(2) With regard to the withheld mail that is handwritten, the Plaintiff and the
Defendants shall prepare and submit an agreed typewritten version of the mail,
separately identifying each piece of mail by reference to an exhibit number.
(3)
The parties shall have until July 2, 2015 to complete this task.
(4) The responses required by this order shall be filed as restricted
documents.
(5)
Plaintiff.
Counsel for the Plaintiff shall not make the contents available to the
DATED this 18th day of June, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?