Fattig v. Cabela's Inc

Filing 45

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 44 Motion to Extend. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed/ to pro se party)(MKR)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
MARK L. FATTIG,
Plaintiff,
v.
CABELA’S INC,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

4:11CV3045

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend. (Filing No. 44.)
In his Motion, Plaintiff asks the court to provide him with an extension of time to
reply to Defendant’s Reply Brief in support of Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment. (Id.) However, Plaintiff is not permitted to file a reply to Defendant’s
Reply Brief without the court’s leave. See NECivR 7.0.1(c). Because Plaintiff has
already filed response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (filing no. 42),
his Motion to Extend is denied.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend (filing no.
44) is denied.
DATED this 13th day of June, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or W eb sites. The U.S. District Court for the District
of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they
provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The
court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases
to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.