Conseco Life Insurance Company v. Funke et al

Filing 32

ORDER - Conseco Life's motion for disbursement of attorney's fees and costscharged against interpleader funds (filing 31 ) is granted. In accordance with the judgment entered on August 24, 2011, the Clerk of the Court is directed to release to Conseco Life $896.50 from the funds that were deposited with the court on April 1, 2011. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy to Finance Department)(AOA)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
JO ANN G. FUNKE, and LINDA B.
FUNKE,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

4:11CV3047

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before me on Plaintiff Conseco Life Insurance Company’s
(“Conseco Life”) motion for disbursement of attorney’s fees and costs charged against
interpleader funds. (Filing 31.) In accordance with the judgment entered on August
24, 2011 (filing 25), Conseco Life’s motion is granted. The Clerk of the Court is
directed to release to Conseco Life $896.50 from the funds that were deposited with
the court on April 1, 2011. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.

Conseco Life’s motion for disbursement of attorney’s fees and costs

charged against interpleader funds (filing 31) is granted.
2.

In accordance with the judgment entered on August 24, 2011, the Clerk

of the Court is directed to release to Conseco Life $896.50 from the funds that were
deposited with the court on April 1, 2011.

DATED this 17 th day of January, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend,
approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties
or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or
functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or
directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
2