Patrick v. Tillman et al

Filing 45

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The parties Joint Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim (filing 43 ) is granted. Casey's counterclaim against Patrick is dismissed with prejudice. The remaining action between Patrick and Defendants, Casey and Roy M. Tillma n, shall proceed in accordance with the progression order of this Court. Casey's Motion to Withdraw (filing 44 ) is granted. The Clerk of the court is directed to term Casey's Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim (filing 39 ) as it has been withdrawn. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (AOA)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
TINA M. PATRICK,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROY M. TILLMAN, and CASEY
INDUSTRIAL, INC.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

4:11CV3137

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before me on a Joint Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim filed by
Counter Defendant Tina M. Patrick (“Patrick”) and Counter Claimant Casey
Industrial, Inc. (“Casey”). (Filing 43.) Also pending is Casey’s Motion to Withdraw
its previously filed Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim. (Filing 44.)
In their Joint Motion, the parties stipulate to dismiss Casey’s counterclaim
against Patrick with prejudice. (Filing 43 at CM/ECF pp. 1-2.) I accept the parties
stipulation and will grant Casey’s Motion to Withdraw. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.

The parties Joint Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim (filing 43) is granted.

2.

Casey’s counterclaim against Patrick is dismissed with prejudice. The

remaining action between Patrick and Defendants, Casey and Roy M. Tillman, shall
proceed in accordance with the progression order of this Court.
3.

Casey’s Motion to Withdraw (filing 44) is granted.

4.

The Clerk of the court is directed to term Casey’s Motion to Dismiss

Counterclaim (filing 39) as it has been withdrawn.

DATED this 12 th day of July, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend,
approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties
or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or
functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or
directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
2