Missionary Benedictine Sisters, Inc. v. Hoffman, LLC

Filing 186

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Third-Party Defendant Lonnie Robinson's motion for reconsideration (Filing No. 178 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MISSIONARY BENEDICTINE SISTERS, ) INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) HOFFMAN, LLC, ) ) Defendant and ) Third-Party Plaintiff ) v. ) ) FREDERICKSEN ENGINEERING, INC., ) VOLKMAN PLUMBING & HEATING, ) INC., and LONNIE ROBINSON d/b/a ) R&R Mechanical Insulation, ) ) Third-Party Defendants ) ) ) ) VOLKMAN PLUMBING & HEATING, ) INC., and AMCO INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) ) Third-Party Plaintiffs ) v. ) ) LONNIE ROBINSON d/b/a R&R Mechanical Insulation, and ENGINEERED ) ) CONTROLS, INC., ) Third-Party Defendants ) ) 4:11CV3180 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Third-Party Defendant Lonnie Robinson, doing business as R&R Mechanical Insulation (“Robinson”), has moved for reconsideration of a portion of the court’s Memorandum and Order that was entered on May 4, 2015. Specifically, Robinson repeats an argument that he is entitled to summary judgment on Third-Party Plaintiffs’ claims for indemnity and contribution because he does not share a common liability with them. He argues that “[i]n order to share a common liability under Nebraska law, privity of contract must exist” (Filing No. 178, ¶ 8). As explained in the court’s previous memorandum and order, for common liability to exist “each party must be liable to the same person.” Estate of Powell ex rel. Powell v. Montange, 765 N.W.2d 496, 500 (Neb. 2009); Coburn v. Reiser, 577 N.W.2d 289, 292 (Neb. 1998); Teegerstrom v. H.J. Jeffries Truck Line, 346 N.W.2d 411, 414 (Neb. 1984). Nebraska law does not require that such common liability be based on the same theory of recovery (e.g., breach of contract). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Third-Party Defendant Lonnie Robinson’s motion for reconsideration (Filing No. 178) is denied. June 12, 2015. BY THE COURT: s/ Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?