Kelly v. Reeves

Filing 10

ORDER OF DISMISSAL - Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(ii), Stephen Kelly's Pro Se Civil Complaint is dismissed without prejudice because it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Order of Dismissal. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed/e-mailed to pro se party)(JAE)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA STEPHEN KELLY, Plaintiff, v. MALLORY REEVES, in her official capacity, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:11CV3208 ORDER OF DISMISSAL This matter is before the court on its own motion. On January 9, 2012, upon initial review I found that Kelly’s complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Filing No. 8.) I gave Kelly the opportunity to amend his claims, and warned Kelly that if he failed to amend his complaint by February 6, 2012, his complaint “will be dismissed without further notice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” (Id. at CM/ECF p. 6.) Kelly has failed to file an amended complaint. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(ii), Stephen Kelly’s Pro Se Civil Complaint is dismissed without prejudice because it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Order of Dismissal. Dated February 29, 2012. BY THE COURT s/ Warren K. Urbom United States Senior District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?