Wilson v. Sabatka-Rine et al
Filing
72
ORDER regarding the MOTION for Sanctions for failure to answer interrogatories served on Defendants per rule33 71 , Plaintiff's Request for First Set of Interrogatories 69 and the MOTION for Sanctions and to Complete answers to interroga tories 70 . The Clerk of Court shall strike the plaintiff's October 16, 2013, filings from the record. The documents need not be mailed to the plaintiff's counsel as she received them when they were electronically filed. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
HAROLD B. WILSON,
Plaintiff,
4:11CV3215
vs.
ORDER
DIANE SABATKA-RINE, et al.,
Defendants.
This matter is before the court on three documents filed on October 16, 2013, by
the plaintiff, himself: Plaintiff’s Request for First Set of Interrogatories to Defendants
(Filing No. 69), Motion for Sanctions and Motion to [Compel] Answers to Interrogatories
(Filing No. 70), and Motions for Sanctions for Failure to Answer Interrogatories Served
on Defendants per Rule 33 (Filing No. 71).
The plaintiff initiated this lawsuit on
November 25, 2011, without the assistance of counsel. See Filing No. 1. The plaintiff
proceeded pro se until October 2, 2013, when the court appointed counsel to represent
him. See Filing No. 64. Counsel entered an appearance and conferred with the court
on the plaintiff’s behalf. See Filing No. 65-67.
The plaintiff and his counsel are reminded,
Once an attorney is appointed or retained, all further
documents and other communications with the court must be
submitted through the attorney, unless the court permits
otherwise.
Any further pro se documents or other
communications submitted to the court may be (1) returned
unfiled to the sending party or (2) forwarded to the sending
party’s attorney.
NEGenR 1.3(i). Rather than resolve or address the substance of the plaintiff’s October
16, 2013, filings, the court will strike them from the record. The plaintiff’s counsel will
review the filings with the plaintiff prior to determining whether they should be refilled by
counsel. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
The Clerk of Court shall strike the plaintiff’s October 16, 2013, filings from the
record. The documents need not be mailed to the plaintiff’s counsel as she received
them when they were electronically filed.
Dated this 16th day of October, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?