Wilson v. Sabatka-Rine et al

Filing 75

ORDER granting the parties' Joint 73 Motion to Change Venue of Trial. The October 8, 2013, Order Setting Final Schedule for Progression of Case is hereby modified to reflect the trial is rescheduled to commence, at the courts call, during the week of July 21, 2014, in Lincoln, Nebraska, before the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (MKR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA HAROLD B. WILSON, Plaintiff, vs. DIANE SABATKA-RINE, et al., 4:11CV3215 ORDER Defendants. This matter is before the court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Change of Venue of Trial (Filing No. 73). The parties filed an index of evidence (Filing No. 74) in support of their motion. On October 8, 2013, the court entered a progression order scheduling the matter for trial on July 21, 2014, in Omaha, Nebraska, pursuant to NEGenR 1.4(a)(5)(D). See Filing No. 67. The parties now seek to designate Lincoln, Nebraska, as the location of trial and provide evidence such location will be more convenient and less costly for the parties, lawyers, and a majority of witnesses. See Filing No. 73. Under the circumstances, the court finds trial of this matter should be held in Lincoln, Nebraska. The pretrial conference shall remain scheduled for Omaha, Nebraska. Upon consideration, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The parties’ Joint Motion for Change of Venue of Trial (Filing No. 73) is granted. 2. The October 8, 2013, Order Setting Final Schedule for Progression of Case is hereby modified to reflect the trial is rescheduled to commence, at the court’s call, during the week of July 21, 2014, in Lincoln, Nebraska, before the Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. Dated this 21st day of November, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?