Kislyak v. Ostrander et al

Filing 9

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
PAVEL KISLYAK,
Plaintiff,
v.
MARK OSTRANDER, and
LRC FORENSIC UNIT,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 4:11CV3225

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On March 5, 2012, the court
conducted an initial review of the Complaint in this matter and concluded that it failed to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Filing No. 8.) However, the court gave
Plaintiff the opportunity to file an amended complaint. (Id. at CM/ECF pp. 4-5.) In doing
so, the court warned Plaintiff that if he failed to file an amended complaint by April 4, 2012,
this matter would be dismissed without further notice. (Id.) Plaintiff failed to file an
amended complaint by the court’s deadline. (See Docket Sheet.)

Accordingly,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.

This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to
prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court’s orders;
and

2.

A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum
and Order.

DATED this 10th day of April, 2012.
BY THE COURT:

s/Laurie Smith Camp
Chief United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S.
District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or
guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites.
Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites.
The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink.
Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does
not affect the opinion of the court.
2