Wiemers v. Astrue
Filing
16
ORDER granting 15 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief.The plaintiff shall on or before July 27, 2012, file and serve his brief; the defendant shall have 35 days from the date on which the plaintiff's brief is filed in which to file an answer brief; within one week after the defendant's answer brief is filed, the plaintiff may file a reply brief and either party may request oral argument or make any other request which may be permitted under 42 U.S.C. § 4 05(g); and in the absence of an order setting the case for oral argument or scheduling further proceedings, the case shall be deemed to be submitted at the expiration of the time period specified in paragraph 3 hereof. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (EJL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
KURTIS T. WIEMERS,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of
Social Security Administration,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
4:11CV3228
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF
IT IS ORDERED that:
1.
the Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief, ECF No. 15, is granted
and the plaintiff shall on or before July 27, 2012, file and serve his brief;
2.
the defendant shall have 35 days from the date on which the plaintiff's brief is filed
in which to file an answer brief;
3.
within one week after the defendant's answer brief is filed, the plaintiff may file a
reply brief and either party may request oral argument or make any other request
which may be permitted under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and
4.
in the absence of an order setting the case for oral argument or scheduling further
proceedings, the case shall be deemed to be submitted at the expiration of the time
period specified in paragraph 3 hereof.
Dated June 26, 2012.
BY THE COURT
____________________________________________
Warren K. Urbom
United States Senior District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?