Flores v. Tyson Foods, Inc.

Filing 195

ORDER granting 194 Motion to Extend. The deadlines to submit the Proposed Order on Final Pretrial Conference are outlined in the order. The April 28, 2014, Final Pretrial Conference and the June 2, 2014, Trial remain as scheduled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (ADB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JUANA S. FLORES, Plaintiff, 4:12CV3089 vs. ORDER TYSON FOODS, INC., Defendant. This matter is before the court on the defendant’s, Tyson Foods, Inc. (Tyson), Motion to Extend Deadlines Related to Preparation and Submission of the Proposed Pretrial Order (Filing No. 194). Tyson seeks extensions of the deadlines in this matter because of Tyson’s pending summary judgment motion. Additionally, counsel for Tyson has scheduling conflicts. Tyson’s counsel conferred with the plaintiff, Juana S. Flores (Flores), and represents Flores objects to the extension. After consideration, IT IS ORDERED: 1. Tyson’s Motion to Extend Deadlines Related to Preparation and Submission of the Proposed Pretrial Order (Filing No. 194) is granted. The deadlines to submit the Proposed Order on Final Pretrial Conference are as follows: a. The deadline for Tyson to submit an initial draft of the Order on Final Pretrial Conference to Flores is extended to March 28, 2014, b. The deadline for Flores to provide her additions and/or proposed deletions to Tyson’s initial draft of the Order on Final Pretrial Conference to Tyson’s counsel is extended to April 17, 2014, and c. The deadline for Tyson’s counsel to submit the Order on Final Pretrial Conference to the Court is extended to April 24, 2014. 2. The April 28, 2014, Final Pretrial Conference and the June 2, 2014, Trial remain as scheduled. Dated this 7th day of March, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/ Thomas D. Thalken United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?