Flores v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
Filing
195
ORDER granting 194 Motion to Extend. The deadlines to submit the Proposed Order on Final Pretrial Conference are outlined in the order. The April 28, 2014, Final Pretrial Conference and the June 2, 2014, Trial remain as scheduled. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (ADB)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JUANA S. FLORES,
Plaintiff,
4:12CV3089
vs.
ORDER
TYSON FOODS, INC.,
Defendant.
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s, Tyson Foods, Inc. (Tyson), Motion to
Extend Deadlines Related to Preparation and Submission of the Proposed Pretrial Order (Filing
No. 194). Tyson seeks extensions of the deadlines in this matter because of Tyson’s pending
summary judgment motion. Additionally, counsel for Tyson has scheduling conflicts. Tyson’s
counsel conferred with the plaintiff, Juana S. Flores (Flores), and represents Flores objects to
the extension. After consideration,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
Tyson’s Motion to Extend Deadlines Related to Preparation and Submission of
the Proposed Pretrial Order (Filing No. 194) is granted. The deadlines to submit the Proposed
Order on Final Pretrial Conference are as follows:
a.
The deadline for Tyson to submit an initial draft of the Order on Final
Pretrial Conference to Flores is extended to March 28, 2014,
b.
The deadline for Flores to provide her additions and/or proposed
deletions to Tyson’s initial draft of the Order on Final Pretrial Conference to
Tyson’s counsel is extended to April 17, 2014, and
c.
The deadline for Tyson’s counsel to submit the Order on Final Pretrial
Conference to the Court is extended to April 24, 2014.
2.
The April 28, 2014, Final Pretrial Conference and the June 2, 2014, Trial remain
as scheduled.
Dated this 7th day of March, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?