Ludlow v. BNSF Railway Company

Filing 97

ORDER - The Joint Motion in Limine Regarding Unresolved Objections to the Parties Designations of Deposition Testimony (Filing 96 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion at the time of trial. The court shall rule on the parties' objections as the video depositions are played in court. Counsel are encouraged to exercise discretion in editing the video depositions to remove those portions that are obviously objectionable. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
KIRK J. LUDLOW,
Plaintiff,
v.
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a
Delaware corporation,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

4:12CV3113

ORDER

After consideration of the Joint Motion in Limine Regarding Unresolved
Objections to the Parties’ Designations of Deposition Testimony (Filing 96),
IT IS ORDERED:
1.

The Joint Motion in Limine Regarding Unresolved Objections to the
Parties’ Designations of Deposition Testimony (Filing 96) is denied
without prejudice to reassertion at the time of trial;

2.

The court shall rule on the parties’ objections as the video depositions are
played in court;

3.

Counsel are encouraged to exercise discretion in editing the video
depositions to remove those portions that are obviously objectionable.

DATED this 9th day of October, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge