Saylor v. State of Nebraska, et al.

Filing 80

ORDER denying as moot the defendants' 41 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; 56 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; 62 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; 15 Motion to Dismiss; 20 Motion to Dismiss Party and 28 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JAMES SAYLOR, Plaintiff, 4:12CV3115 vs. ORDER STATE OF NEBRASKA, RANDY KOHL, DENNIS BAKEWELL, ROBERT HOUSTON, NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, NATALIE BAKER, M.D.; MOHAMMAD KAMAL, M.D.; CAMERON WHITE, PhD.; MARK WEILAGE, Ph.D.; FRED BRITTEN, KARI PEREZ, Ph.D; and CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, Defendants. This matter is before the court on its own motion. The defendants’ pending motions to dismiss have been rendered moot by the filing of an amended complaint. See Filing Nos. 77, 78 and 79. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the defendants’ motions to dismiss (Filing Nos. 15, 20, 28, 41, 56, and 62) are denied as moot. Dated this 18th day of April, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?