Saylor v. State of Nebraska, et al.
Filing
80
ORDER denying as moot the defendants' 41 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; 56 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; 62 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; 15 Motion to Dismiss; 20 Motion to Dismiss Party and 28 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JAMES SAYLOR,
Plaintiff,
4:12CV3115
vs.
ORDER
STATE OF NEBRASKA, RANDY KOHL,
DENNIS BAKEWELL, ROBERT
HOUSTON, NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT
OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,
NATALIE BAKER, M.D.; MOHAMMAD
KAMAL, M.D.; CAMERON WHITE, PhD.;
MARK WEILAGE, Ph.D.; FRED BRITTEN,
KARI PEREZ, Ph.D; and CORRECT
CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC,
Defendants.
This matter is before the court on its own motion. The defendants’ pending
motions to dismiss have been rendered moot by the filing of an amended complaint.
See Filing Nos. 77, 78 and 79. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the defendants’ motions to dismiss (Filing Nos. 15, 20, 28,
41, 56, and 62) are denied as moot.
Dated this 18th day of April, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?