Albaiaty v. Pocwierz

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM OPINION - A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (AOA)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
EBTIHAL ALBAIATY,
Plaintiff,
v.
TED POCWIERZ, Lt., in his
personal and official
capacity,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

4:12CV3120

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on its own motion.

On

August 13, 2012, the Court entered a Memorandum and Order
directing plaintiff to file an amended complaint no later than
September 13, 2012 (Filing No. 7).

Plaintiff was warned that

failure to file an amended complaint by that deadline would
result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice.
Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or any other
response to the Court’s Memorandum and Order.

A separate

judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum
Opinion.
DATED this 11th day of October, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
____________________________
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse,
recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products
they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with
any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no
responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus,
the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other
site does not affect the opinion of the Court.

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse,
recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products
they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with
any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no
responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus,
the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other
site does not affect the opinion of the Court.

-2-