Sandoval v. Oldehoeft et al
Filing
136
ORDER - THIS MATTER, having come before this Court upon National Railroad Passenger Corp., d/b/a Amtrak's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Provide its Rule 26 Expert Reports (Filing No. 52). The Court having reviewed said files and being ot herwise fully advised in the premises, HEREBY GRANTS Amtrak's Motion (Filing No. 52). Plaintiff National Railroad Passenger Corp. d/b/a Amtrak shall have through and including September 6, 2013 to file its Rule 26 expert disclosures and reports. Member Cases: 4:12-cv-03129-RGK-CRZ, 8:13-cv-00102-RGK-CRZOrdered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (TCL )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
LEONARD C. SANDOVAL,
Plaintiff,
4:12CV3129
vs.
CHAD E. OLDEHOEFT, LEONARD E.
OLDEHOEFT, MURPHY GROUP, INC.,
an Oklahoma Corporation; and MURPHY
INDUSTRIES, LLC,
Defendants.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION d/b/a AMTRAK,
8:13CV102
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER
CHAD E. OLDEHOEFT, LEONARD E.
OLDEHOEFT, MURPHY GROUP, INC.,
an Oklahoma Corporation; and MURPHY
INDUSTRIES, LLC,
Defendants.
THIS MATTER, having come before this Court upon National Railroad Passenger
Corp., d/b/a Amtrak's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Provide its Rule 26 Expert
Reports (Filing No. 52). The Court having reviewed said files and being otherwise fully
advised in the premises, HEREBY GRANTS Amtrak's Motion (Filing No. 52). Plaintiff
National Railroad Passenger Corp. d/b/a Amtrak shall have through and including
September 6, 2013 to file its Rule 26 expert disclosures and reports.
Dated this 12th day of August, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?