Sandoval v. Oldehoeft et al

Filing 136

ORDER - THIS MATTER, having come before this Court upon National Railroad Passenger Corp., d/b/a Amtrak's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Provide its Rule 26 Expert Reports (Filing No. 52). The Court having reviewed said files and being ot herwise fully advised in the premises, HEREBY GRANTS Amtrak's Motion (Filing No. 52). Plaintiff National Railroad Passenger Corp. d/b/a Amtrak shall have through and including September 6, 2013 to file its Rule 26 expert disclosures and reports. Member Cases: 4:12-cv-03129-RGK-CRZ, 8:13-cv-00102-RGK-CRZOrdered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (TCL )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA LEONARD C. SANDOVAL, Plaintiff, 4:12CV3129 vs. CHAD E. OLDEHOEFT, LEONARD E. OLDEHOEFT, MURPHY GROUP, INC., an Oklahoma Corporation; and MURPHY INDUSTRIES, LLC, Defendants. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION d/b/a AMTRAK, 8:13CV102 Plaintiff, vs. ORDER CHAD E. OLDEHOEFT, LEONARD E. OLDEHOEFT, MURPHY GROUP, INC., an Oklahoma Corporation; and MURPHY INDUSTRIES, LLC, Defendants. THIS MATTER, having come before this Court upon National Railroad Passenger Corp., d/b/a Amtrak's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Provide its Rule 26 Expert Reports (Filing No. 52). The Court having reviewed said files and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, HEREBY GRANTS Amtrak's Motion (Filing No. 52). Plaintiff National Railroad Passenger Corp. d/b/a Amtrak shall have through and including September 6, 2013 to file its Rule 26 expert disclosures and reports. Dated this 12th day of August, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/ Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?