Lange v. Hoskins et al

Filing 50

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - After conferring with the parties, 1) Any opposition to KPMG's motions to compel arbitration, (filing nos. 5 , 13 , and 42 ), and the FDIC's motion to intervene, (filing no. 39 ), shall be filed on or before S eptember 24, 2012. Any reply thereto shall be filed on before October 4, 2012.2) The deadline for responding to the plaintiff's motion to remand and to abstain, (filing no. 30 ), is continued. Any response to the motion for remand or to abs tain shall be filed on or before ten days following the court's (meaning the ruling of the district judge as and if required) ruling on KPMG's motions to compel arbitration and/or the FDIC's motion to intervene.3) The deadline for filing an answer or response to the plaintiff's complaint is continued. The Defendants' answer or other responsive pleading shall be filed within thirty (30) days after the court (including any ruling by the district judge as required) resolves plaintiff's motion to remand this case.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (JAB) Modified on 9/11/2012 to correct date of filing. (JAB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
RICK D. LANGE, as Chapter 7 Trustee of
the Bankruptcy Estate of TierOne
Corporation;

4:12CV3148

Plaintiff,
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

vs.
CHARLES W. HOSKINS, CAMPBELL R.
MCCONNELL, GILBERT G.
LUNDSTROM, EUGENE B. WITKOWICZ,
JAMES A. LAPHEN, KPMG LLP,
Defendants.
After conferring with the parties,

IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion for a planning conference, (filing no. 36),
is granted, and
1) Any opposition to KPMG’s motions to compel arbitration, (filing nos. 5, 13, and
42), and the FDIC’s motion to intervene, (filing no.39), shall be filed on or before
September 24, 2012. Any reply thereto shall be filed on before October 4, 2012.
2) The deadline for responding to the plaintiff’s motion to remand and to abstain,
(filing no. 30), is continued. Any response to the motion for remand or to abstain
shall be filed on or before ten days following the court’s (meaning the ruling of
the district judge as and if required) ruling on KPMG’s motions to compel
arbitration and/or the FDIC’s motion to intervene.
3) The deadline for filing an answer or response to the plaintiff’s complaint is
continued. The Defendants’ answer or other responsive pleading shall be filed
within thirty (30) days after the court (including any ruling by the district judge as
required) resolves plaintiff’s motion to remand this case.
September 10, 2012.

BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge