Lange v. Hoskins et al
Filing
97
ORDER granting 88 the parties' Joint Stipulation and all proceedings on FDIC-R's motion for summary judgment [90-1], and any related filings are stayed until 12/10/13. All proceedings on the following pending matters are also stayed until December 10, 2013: 1. KPMG's motion to compel arbitration 5 ; 2. KPMG's amended motion to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss 13 ; 3. Trustee's motion to remand and abstain 30 ; 4. KPMG's motion to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss 42 ; 5. Magistrate Judge's findings, recommendation, and order 79 ; and 6. KPMG's statement of objections 81 . Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (JSF)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
RICK D. LANGE, as Chapter 7
Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of
TierOne Corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION, as Receiver for
TierOne Bank,
Intervenor,
v.
CHARLES W. HOSKINS;
CAMPBELL R. MCCONNELL;
GILBERT G. LUNDSTROM;
EUGENE B. WITKOWICZ;
JAMES A. LAPHEN; and
KPMG LLP,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
4:12CV3148
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that the parties’ joint stipulation (filing 88), treated as a
motion, is granted, and all proceedings on FDIC-R’s motion for summary judgment
(filing 90-1), and any related filings, are stayed until December 10, 2013.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED on the court’s own motion that all proceedings
on the following pending matters are also stayed until December 10, 2013:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
KPMG’s motion to compel arbitration (filing 5);
KPMG’s amended motion to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss
(filing 13);
Trustee’s motion to remand and abstain (filing 30);
KPMG’s motion to compel arbitration and motion to dismiss (filing 42);
Magistrate Judge’s findings, recommendation, and order (filing 79); and
KPMG’s statement of objections (filing 81).
November 19, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?