Aguilar

Filing 4

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER-Petitioner shall have until November 19, 2012, to show good cause or excusable neglect for his failure to comply with the courts September 12, 2012, Memorandum and Order; and ***Pro Se Case Management Deadlines: ( Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 11/19/2012: check for response.) Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(MKR)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
BILLY R. AGUILAR,
Petitioner,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
STATE OF NEBRASKA,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 4:12CV3155

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On September 12, 2012, the court
entered a Memorandum and Order provisionally filing this matter but requiring Petitioner
to either file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $5.00 filing fee no
later than October 11, 2012. (Filing No. 3.) The court warned Petitioner that failure to
comply with its Memorandum and Order would result in dismissal of this matter without
further notice. (Id.) Petitioner has not paid the $5.00 filing fee or filed any other response
to the court’s previous Memorandum and Order. (See Docket Sheet.) On the court’s own
motion Petitioner shall have until November 19, 2012, to show good cause or excusable
neglect for his failure to comply with the court’s September 12, 2012, Memorandum and
Order.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.

Petitioner shall have until November 19, 2012, to show good cause or
excusable neglect for his failure to comply with the court’s September 12,
2012, Memorandum and Order; and

2.

The Clerk of the court is directed to set a pro se case management in this
case with the following text: November 19, 2012: check for response.

DATED this 23rd day of October, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/Laurie Smith Camp
Chief United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites.

The U.S. District
Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third
parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no
agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility
for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work
or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.