Aguilar

Filing 5

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- This matter is dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the courts filing fee and for failure to comply with court orders; and A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (MKR)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
BILLY R. AGUILAR,
Petitioner,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
STATE OF NEBRASKA,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 4:12CV3155

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On September 12, 2012, the court
entered a Memorandum and Order provisionally filing this matter but requiring Petitioner
to either file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $5.00 filing fee no
later than October 11, 2012. (Filing No. 3.) The court warned Petitioner that failure to
comply with its Memorandum and Order would result in dismissal of this matter without
further notice. (Id.) Petitioner failed to pay the $5.00 filing fee or file a response to the
court’s September 12, 2012, Memorandum and Order. (See Docket Sheet.)
On October 23, 2012, the court gave Petitioner until November 19, 2012, to show
good cause or excusable neglect for his failure to comply with the court’s September 12,
2012, Memorandum and Order. (Filing No. 4.) Petitioner failed to respond. (See Docket
Sheet.) Accordingly,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.

This matter is dismissed without prejudice for failure to pay the court’s filing
fee and for failure to comply with court orders; and

2.

A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum
and Order.

DATED this 27th day of November, 2012.
BY THE COURT:

s/Laurie Smith Camp
Chief United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S.
District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or
guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites.
Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites.
The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink.
Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does
not affect the opinion of the court.
2