Fletcher v. Houston et al
Filing
87
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Cathie Peters' Motion to Extend Progression Order Deadline for Dispositive Motions (Filing No. 85) is granted. Cathie Peters shall have until January 2, 2015, to file a motion for summary judgment based on qualified i mmunity. The plaintiff shall have until February 2, 2015, to file a response. The parties shall have ten (10) days from the date the court rules on the motion for summary judgment, in which to schedule a telephone planning conference with the cou rt, if necessary, to further progress the case. Counsel for the plaintiff shall contact the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge within such time period to schedule the telephone planning conference. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TCL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
BARRY W. FLETCHER, SR.,
Plaintiff,
4:12CV3179
vs.
ORDER
CATHIE PETERS, et al.,
Defendants.
This matter is before the court after a telephone conference with counsel for the
parties. Michael D. Gooch represented the plaintiff and Amie E. Larson represented
Cathie Peters. In accordance with the discussion,
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
Cathie Peters’ Motion to Extend Progression Order Deadline for
Dispositive Motions (Filing No. 85) is granted.
2.
Cathie Peters shall have until January 2, 2015, to file a motion for
summary judgment based on qualified immunity.
3.
The plaintiff shall have until February 2, 2015, to file a response.
4.
The parties shall have ten (10) days from the date the court rules on the
motion for summary judgment, in which to schedule a telephone planning conference
with the court, if necessary, to further progress the case. Counsel for the plaintiff shall
contact the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge within such time period to
schedule the telephone planning conference.
Dated this 12th day of December, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Thomas D. Thalken
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?