Bush v. Thurber

Filing 7

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Bush failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with my orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this memorandum and order. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (MKR, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
CHARLIE B. BUSH JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL THURBER, Director of
Lancaster County Jail,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

4:12CV3195

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On October 15, 2012, an
initial review was conducted of the plaintiff’s complaint and I found that the
complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Filing No. 6.)
I gave the plaintiff, Charlie B. Bush Jr. (“Bush”), an opportunity to amend his claims,
but warned him that if he failed to amend by November 13, 2012, his claims would
“be dismissed without further notice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may
be granted.” (Id. at CM/ECF p. 5.) Bush has failed to file an amended complaint.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Bush failed to
prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with my orders.

2.
A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this
memorandum and order.
Dated November 26, 2012.
BY THE COURT

__________________________________________
Warren K. Urbom
United States Senior District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend,
approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties
or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or
functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or
directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
2