Gadekan v. United States Department of Agriculture et al

Filing 7

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 6 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JOHN A. GADEKAN, for himself and as Personal Representative of Lola Gadeken Estate, Arnold W. Gadeken Estate, Arnold W. Gadeken Residuary Trust, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:12CV3208 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration. (Filing No. 6.) In his Motion, Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the court’s December 3, 2012, Memorandum and Order denying his Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Filing No. 5.) The court has carefully reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion and finds no good cause for reconsideration of any portion of its December 3, 2012, Memorandum and Order. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (filing no. 6) is denied. DATED this 27th day of December, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon United States District Judge *This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?