Lautenbaugh v. Nebraska State Bar Association et al

Filing 9

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Judge Zwart recuses herself from this case. Judge Kopf will handle this case without the assistance of a magistrate judge. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (ADB)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA SCOTT LAUTENBAUGH, on behalf of himself and the class he seeks to represent, Plaintiffs, v. NEBRASKA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, WARREN R. WHITTED, JR., President, Nebraska State Bar Association, in his official capacity; MARSHA E. FANGMEYER, PresidentElect, Nebraska State Bar Association, in her official capacity; G. MICHAEL FENNER, PresidentElect Designate, Nebraska State Bar Association, in his official capacity, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:12CV3214 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This case involves the Nebraska State Bar Association. Defendants from using their member dues for certain activities. The suit seeks to prevent Judge Zwart must be a member of the Nebraska State Bar Association in order to seek reappointment. See 28 U.S.C. ยง 631(b). On the other hand, Judge Kopf is not a member of the Nebraska State Bar Association and he is not required to be a member of that association to continue as a judge. Under the foregoing circumstances, Judge Zwart contacted Judge Kopf. They then conferred. The judges have jointly agreed that Judge Zwart will recuse, although she may not have an ethical obligation to do so. Judge Kopf will handle this case without the assistance of a magistrate judge. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Judge Zwart recuses herself from this case. 2. Judge Kopf will handle this case without the assistance of a magistrate judge. October 15, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/Cheryl R. Zwart Cheryl R. Zwart United States Magistrate Judge and s/Richard G. Kopf Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?