Brantely v. BNSF Railway Company

Filing 67

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER- The magistrate judge's findings and recommendation (filing 66 ) is adopted. The defendant's motion to dismiss (filing 63 ) is granted. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (MKR) .

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA KENNETH BRANTLEY, Plaintiff, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:12CV3215 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court on Magistrate Judge Zwart’s findings and recommendation. (Filing 66.) Plaintiff did not file a statement of objections. The magistrate recommends that defendant’s motion to dismiss be granted in its entirety, and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. I have conducted a de novo review of the record. I find that inasmuch as the magistrate judge has fully, carefully, and correctly found the facts and applied the law, the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation should be adopted and the defendant’s motion to dismiss should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation (filing 66) is adopted. 2. The defendant’s motion to dismiss (filing 63) is granted. DATED this 4th day of March, 2014. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge *This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?