Goral v. Eaton Corporation et al
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Motion to Withdraw Summary Judgment Motion (Filing 64 ) filed by defendant MQ Automation/Mosier Division Indiana is granted. The Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing 61 ) filed by defendant MQ Automation/Mosier Division Indiana is denied as moot without prejudice to refiling. To the extent all parties to this lawsuit have settled this action, the parties should notify the court pursuant to NECivR 41.1. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ANDREA GORAL, Personal
Representative of the ESTATE OF
KRISTINE GRIFFING, deceased,
Plaintiff,
v.
OMRON STI MACHINE
SERVICES INC., MQ
AUTOMATION/MOSIER
DIVISION INDIANA, and EATON
CORPORATION,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
4:13CV3003
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
Because “the parties hereto successfully negotiated a mediated settlement
agreement, obviating the need for summary judgment,” defendant MQ
Automation/Mosier Division Indiana moves (Filing 64) to withdraw its pending
motion for summary judgment (Filing 61) without prejudice to refiling. I shall grant
the defendant’s motion.
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
The Motion to Withdraw Summary Judgment Motion (Filing 64) filed
by defendant MQ Automation/Mosier Division Indiana is granted;
2.
The Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing 61) filed by defendant MQ
Automation/Mosier Division Indiana is denied as moot without prejudice to refiling;
and
3.
To the extent all parties to this lawsuit have settled this action, the parties
should notify the court pursuant to NECivR 41.1.
DATED this 10th day of March, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?