Goral v. Eaton Corporation et al

Filing 65

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Motion to Withdraw Summary Judgment Motion (Filing 64 ) filed by defendant MQ Automation/Mosier Division Indiana is granted. The Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing 61 ) filed by defendant MQ Automation/Mosier Division Indiana is denied as moot without prejudice to refiling. To the extent all parties to this lawsuit have settled this action, the parties should notify the court pursuant to NECivR 41.1. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ANDREA GORAL, Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF KRISTINE GRIFFING, deceased, Plaintiff, v. OMRON STI MACHINE SERVICES INC., MQ AUTOMATION/MOSIER DIVISION INDIANA, and EATON CORPORATION, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:13CV3003 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Because “the parties hereto successfully negotiated a mediated settlement agreement, obviating the need for summary judgment,” defendant MQ Automation/Mosier Division Indiana moves (Filing 64) to withdraw its pending motion for summary judgment (Filing 61) without prejudice to refiling. I shall grant the defendant’s motion. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Motion to Withdraw Summary Judgment Motion (Filing 64) filed by defendant MQ Automation/Mosier Division Indiana is granted; 2. The Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing 61) filed by defendant MQ Automation/Mosier Division Indiana is denied as moot without prejudice to refiling; and 3. To the extent all parties to this lawsuit have settled this action, the parties should notify the court pursuant to NECivR 41.1. DATED this 10th day of March, 2014. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?