Perry v. Lancaster County Nebraska
Filing
26
ORDER - Defendant's Motion to Substitute Evidentiary Materials Filed in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing 23 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court shall: (a) strike and seal what is now Filings 18-10, 18-11, and 18-1 2; (b) file Filing 23-3 as Filing 18-58; (c) file Filing 18-11 as Filing 18-59; and (d) file Filing 18-12 as Filing 18-60. Plaintiff's unopposed Motion to Extend Plaintiff's Brief Date in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summar y Judgment (Filing 25 ) is granted, and Plaintiff's brief shall be filed on or before December 30, 2013. Defendant may file a reply to Plaintiff's brief on or before January 6, 2014, after which Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing 17 ) shall be ripe for disposition. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Zwart to determine whether the pretrial conference and the trial in this matter should be continued. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
PRECIOUS PERRY,
Plaintiff,
v.
LANCASTER COUNTY,
NEBRASKA,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
4:13CV3013
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED:
1.
Defendant’s Motion to Substitute Evidentiary Materials Filed in Support
of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing 23) is granted. The Clerk of
Court shall: (a) strike and seal what is now Filings 18-10, 18-11, and 18-12; (b) file
Filing 23-3 as Filing 18-58; (c) file Filing 18-11 as Filing 18-59; and (d) file Filing
18-12 as Filing 18-60.1
2.
Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion to Extend Plaintiff’s Brief Date in
Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing 25) is granted, and
Plaintiff’s brief shall be filed on or before December 30, 2013.
1
Pursuant to the Chief Judge’s directive and the Clerk of Court’s policy,
exhibits cannot simply be replaced; rather, they must be stricken and sealed. Because
the substitution requested involves the first portion of a three-part exhibit, all three
parts of the exhibit must be stricken and sealed and then appended to the end of the
exhibits contained in Filing 18.
3.
Defendant may file a reply to Plaintiff’s brief on or before January 6,
2014, after which Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing 17) shall be
ripe for disposition.
4.
This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Zwart to determine whether
the pretrial conference and the trial in this matter should be continued.
DATED this 19th day of December, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend,
approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties
or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or
functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or
directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?