Atem v. County of Lancaster et al

Filing 190

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's second and third Motions to Dismiss Party (filings 184 and 185 ) are granted, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendants City of Lincoln, Tarvis Banks, and Eric Hutsell are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's first Motion to Dismiss Party (filing 183 ), which was amended by his second Motion to Dismiss Party, is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (GJG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
AROK ATEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
COUNTY OF LANCASTER, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

4:13CV3017

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before me on three Motions to Dismiss Party filed by Plaintiff. (Filings
183, 184, and 185.) In his Motions, Plaintiff asks me to dismiss Defendants City of Lincoln,
Tarvis Banks, and Eric Hutsell with prejudice. (Id.) Plaintiff’s Motions are unopposed.1 (See
Docket Sheet.)
IT IS ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s second and third Motions to Dismiss Party (filings 184 and 185) are
granted, and Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants City of Lincoln, Tarvis Banks, and Eric
Hutsell are dismissed with prejudice.
2.
Plaintiff’s first Motion to Dismiss Party (filing 183), which was amended by his
second Motion to Dismiss Party, is denied.
DATED this 11th day of February, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
On February 10, 2015, the parties confirmed during a conference call with Magistrate
Judge Zwart that filings 183, 184, and 185, are unopposed by all parties.
1

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S.
District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee
any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the
court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts
no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a
hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of
the court.