Atem v. County of Lancaster et al

Filing 59

ORDER - The plaintiffs motion to extend, (Filing No. 52 ), is denied. On or before May 7, 2014, the plaintiff shall file his motion to amend the complaint to specifically name those Doe defendants against whom Plaintiff believes, or has a good f aith basis to believe, could be liable to the plaintiff based on the information provided in discovery to date. The Rule 16 deadline for filing Plaintiffs motion to amend pleadings to add or name parties ((Filing No. 38 , 5), is set aside. Any further amendments to specifically name Doe defendants will be governed by Rule 15. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl R. Zwart. (AOA)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
AROK ATEM,
Plaintiff,

4:13CV3017

vs.
ORDER
COUNTY OF LANCASTER, a Nebraska
political subdivision; CITY OF LINCOLN,
a Nebraska political subdivision; and
DOES 1-10, in their individual and official
capacities;
Defendants.
IT IS ORDERED:

1)

The plaintiff’s motion to extend, (Filing No. 52), is denied.

2)

On or before May 7, 2014, the plaintiff shall file his motion to amend the

complaint to specifically name those Doe defendants against whom Plaintiff believes, or
has a good faith basis to believe, could be liable to the plaintiff based on the information
provided in discovery to date.

3)

The Rule 16 deadline for filing Plaintiff’s motion to amend pleadings to

add or name parties ((Filing No. 38, ¶ 5), is set aside. Any further amendments to
specifically name Doe defendants will be governed by Rule 15.

April 29, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Cheryl R. Zwart
United States Magistrate Judge