Woolman v. Three Eagles et al

Filing 11

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that this matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
MICHAEL B. WOOLMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
THREE EAGLES, Communication &
Family & Employees, and DIAMONDS
MIDWEST ESCORT SERVICE,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

4:13CV3024

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On June 21, 2013, the court
conducted an initial review of Plaintiff’s Complaint and found that it failed to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted. (Filing No. 9.) The court gave Plaintiff an opportunity to
amend his Complaint, but warned Plaintiff that if he failed to amend by July 22, 2013, his
claims would “be dismissed without further notice.” (Id. at CM/ECF p. 3.) To date, Plaintiff
has not filed an amended complaint and the time in which to do so has now passed.
Accordingly,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute
this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court’s orders.
2.

A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and

Order.
DATED this 23rd day of September, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of
Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their
Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no
responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the
user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.