King v. Houston et al
ORDER AND JUDGMENT - Tek's Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 40 ) is granted and judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff. King's claims against Tek, Hilgert, and Soyh under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are dismissed with prejudice. Any remaining state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. King's Motion for Court Order (Filing No. 43 ) is denied as moot. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
JOANNE HILGERT, MEL SOYH and )
TEK INDUSTRIES, INC.,
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the memorandum opinion entered this date,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Tek’s Motion to Dismiss (Filing No. 40) is granted
and judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against
2) King’s claims against Tek, Hilgert, and Soyh under
42 U.S.C. § 1981 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are dismissed with
Any remaining state law claims are dismissed without
3) King’s Motion for Court Order (Filing No. 43) is
denied as moot.
Plaintiff is hereby notified that the filing of a
notice of appeal will make him liable for payment of the full
$505.00 appellate filing fee regardless of the outcome of the
This is because the Prison Litigation Reform Act
requires an incarcerated civil appellant to pay the full amount
of the $505.00 appellate filing fee by making monthly payments to
the court, even if he or she is proceeding in forma pauperis.
U.S.C. § 1915(b).
By filing a notice of appeal, plaintiff will
be consenting to the deduction of the $505.00 filing fee from his
prison account by prison officials.
DATED this 11th day of March, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites.
The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse,
recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products
they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with
any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no
responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus,
the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other
site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?