Roland v. Social Security Administration
Filing
17
ORDER granting 16 Defendant's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Brief. The Defendants Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Brief, ECF No. 16, is granted; 2. the defe ndant shall have on or before November 4, 2013, in which to file and serve her response to the plaintiff's brief; 3. within one week after the defendant's answer brief is filed, the plaintiff may file and serve a reply brief ; and 4. the case shall be deemed to be submitted at the expiration of the time period specified in paragraph 3 hereof.Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (EJL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
CAROL MAE ROLAND,
Plaintiff,
4:13CV3085
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of the Social Security
Administration,
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S
SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S BRIEF
Defendant.
The defendant, by an through her counsel, has filed Defendant’s Second Unopposed
Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Brief, ECF No. 16. The defendant
requests an extension of 30 days in which to respond to the plaintiff’s brief and states that the
plaintiff’s counsel has been contacted and has expressed no objection to the extension.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that:
1. the Defendant’s Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to
Plaintiff’s Brief, ECF No. 16, is granted;
2. the defendant shall have on or before November 4, 2013, in which to file and serve her
response to the plaintiff's brief;
3. within one week after the defendant's answer brief is filed, the plaintiff may file and
serve a reply brief ; and
4. the case shall be deemed to be submitted at the expiration of the time period specified
in paragraph 3 hereof.
Dated October 1, 2013.
BY THE COURT
___________________________________________
Warren K. Urbom
United States Senior District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?