Roland v. Social Security Administration

Filing 19

ORDER granting 18 Defendant's Third Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Brief. The defendant shall have on or before December 4, 2013, in which to file and serve her response to the plaintiff's brief; wi thin one week after the defendant's answer brief is filed, the plaintiff may file and serve a reply brief ; and the case shall be deemed to be submitted at the expiration of the time period specified in paragraph 3 hereof. Ordered by Senior Judge Warren K. Urbom. (EJL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA CAROL MAE ROLAND, Plaintiff, 4:13CV3085 vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration; and OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S THIRD UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF Defendants. The defendant, by an through her counsel, has filed Defendant’s Third Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Brief, ECF No. 18. The defendant requests an extension until December 4, 2013, in which to respond to the plaintiff’s brief and states that the plaintiff’s counsel has been contacted and has expressed no objection to the extension. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that: 1. the Defendant’s Third Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Brief, ECF No. 18, is granted; 2. the defendant shall have on or before December 4, 2013, in which to file and serve her response to the plaintiff's brief; 3. within one week after the defendant's answer brief is filed, the plaintiff may file and serve a reply brief ; and 4. the case shall be deemed to be submitted at the expiration of the time period specified in paragraph 3 hereof. Dated November 5, 2013. BY THE COURT ___________________________________________ Warren K. Urbom United States Senior District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?