Tyler v. EPA
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party) (JSF)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
BILLY TYLER,
Plaintiff,
v.
EPA,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
4:13CV3119
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on its own motion. On October 8, 2013, the court
entered a Memorandum and Order directing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint no
later than November 8, 2013. (Filing No. 9.) The court warned Plaintiff that failure to
file an amended complaint by the court’s deadline would result in the dismissal of this
matter without further notice. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint in
this matter.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: This matter is dismissed without prejudice
because Plaintiff failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this
court’s orders.
A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this
Memorandum and Order.
DATED this 30th day of December, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District
of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide
on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court
accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to
work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?