Booth v. Pokorny

Filing 10

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER regarding: Memorandum and Order 8 . Plaintiff shall have 20 days from the date of this Memorandum and Order to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of which this matter will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. ***Pro Se Case Management Deadline set for 12/6/2013: deadline for informing court of address. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(JAB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DOMINIQUE DE’SEAN BOOTH,
Plaintiff,
v.
JUDGE GALE POKORNY,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 4:13CV3146

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on its own motion. On November 5, 2013, the Clerk
of the court sent an Order to Plaintiff at his last known address. (Filing No. 8.) On
November 12, 2013, the Order was returned to the court as undeliverable, and no
forwarding information was provided. (Filing No. 9.) Plaintiff has an obligation to keep the
court informed of his current address at all times. See NEGenR 1.3(e) and (g) (requiring
pro se parties to adhere to local rules and inform the court of address changes within 30
days). This case cannot be prosecuted in this court if Plaintiff’s whereabouts remain
unknown.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff shall have 20 days from the date of this
Memorandum and Order to apprise the court of his current address, in the absence of
which this matter will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk
of the court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the
following text: December 6, 2013: deadline for informing court of address.
DATED this 13th day of November, 2013.
BY THE COURT:

s/Laurie Smith Camp
Chief United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S.
District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or
guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites.
Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites.
The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink.
Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does
not affect the opinion of the court.