Roberts v. Trotta et al

Filing 29

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 27 Motion for Leave and 24 Motion for Leave. Plaintiff shall have until April 14, 2014, to file a third amended complaint. The clerk's office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline using the following text: April 14, 2014: Deadline for Plaintiff to file a third amended complaint. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(ADB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
NICK ROBERTS,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
TROTTA, et al.,
Defendants.

4:13CV3154

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motions for Leave to Amend. (Filing Nos. 24
and 27.) On December 20, 2013, the court granted Plaintiff leave to file a Second Amended
Complaint. (Filing No. 19.) Thereafter, Plaintiff has filed a Second Amended Complaint, three
supplements, and two Motions requesting leave to amend his Second Amended Complaint. (Filing
Nos. 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 and 27.)
After careful consideration, the court will grant Plaintiff leave to file a third amended
complaint. Plaintiff is directed to consolidate all of the claims contained in his past complaints, and
any new allegations, into the third amended complaint. Failure to consolidate all claims into one
document will result in the abandonment of claims.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motions for Leave to Amend (filing nos. 24 and 27) are granted. Plaintiff
shall have until April 14, 2014, to file a third amended complaint.
2.
The clerk’s office is directed to set a pro se case management deadline using the
following text: April 14, 2014: Deadline for Plaintiff to file a third amended complaint.
DATED this 11th day of March, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
United States District Judge

*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for
the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services
or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third
parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any
hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect
the opinion of the court.