Gray v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION - Accordingly, this matter will be dismissed without prejudice. A separate order and judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF
ROBERT P. HOUSTON, Director of)
NDCS, FRANK X. HOPKINS,
Deputy Director of
Institutions, BRAIN GAGE,
Warden of TSCI, RULE, CM, Case)
Manager of TSCI, BARKER, CW, )
Case Worker of TSCI, JASON
TAYLOR, CM, Case Manager of
TSCI, JOHN LEDUC, CM, Case
Manager of TSCI, RADAR, Ofc., )
Correctional Officer of TSCI, )
KRAUSS, Ofc., Correctional
Officer of TSCI, and SCHULTS, )
CM, Case Manager of TSCI,
This matter is before the Court on its own motion.
September 6, 2013, the Court required plaintiff to show cause why
he is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to
the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §1915(g) (Filing No. 6).
determined that the following six cases were brought by plaintiff
and dismissed as frivolous:
Gray v. Condon, No. 4:95CV3177 (D.
Neb. June 21, 1995); Gray v. Grammar, No. 4:95CV3446 (D. Neb.
Apr. 18, 1996); Gray v. Smith, No. 4:95CV3405 (D. Neb. Mar. 15,
1996); Gray v. Grammer, No. 4:95CV3404 (D. Neb. Feb. 14, 1996);
Gray v. Smith, No. 4:95CV3339 (D. Neb. Nov. 30, 1995); Gray v.
Webber, No. 4:95CV3326 (D. Neb. Jan. 4, 1995).
Plaintiff did not
file a response to the Court’s September 6, 2013, Memorandum and
Order, nor has he paid the Court’s $400.00 filing and
Accordingly, this matter will be dismissed
A separate order and judgment will be entered
in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion.
DATED this 5th day of November, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court
* This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S.
District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or
guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites.
Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web
sites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any
hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some
other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?