James v. Tan et al

Filing 15

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court's orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA BRANDON JAMES, Plaintiff, v. BRANDON TAN, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 4:13CV3206 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court on its own motion. On May 5, 2014, the court entered a Memorandum and Order directing Plaintiff to file an amended complaint no later than June 4, 2014. (Filing No. 14.) The court warned Plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint by the court’s deadline would result in the dismissal of this matter without further notice. To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint in this matter. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: This matter is dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to prosecute this matter diligently and failed to comply with this court’s orders. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this Memorandum and Order. DATED this 27th day of June, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/Laurie Smith Camp Chief United States District Judge *This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?