Lumanga v. SPLA/SPLM et al

Filing 16

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER terminating 15 Motion for Reconsideration. The clerk's office is directed to term the motion event appearing at Filing Number 15. To the extent Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the court's Memorandum and Order dated May 21, 2014, his request is denied. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(SLP)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA LORUWE LUKUDA LUMANGA, Plaintiff, v. SPLA/SPLM, SALVER KIRR, DR. RAEH MANSHAR, SUDAN SSTV 2, RODOLPH, KAY ALEX GANDER, DON RINOH, CWS U.SA, BILL CLINTON, OMAR EL BASHIR, DOOD MOHAMAD, CHARLIE SESSION REED, Kaplan Univ Teacher, KAWUNDA AUDIO, KAWUNDA JOHN LODO MOGGA, JOHN MENA JESHUA, SEPUREN LUKUDU ZACHARIA, Teacher, J. PATRICK MULLEN, GOI KONYI JOSEPH, Douglas Correction omaha, NE, REGIONAL CENTER, Corrections Omaha, J. PATRICK MULLENS, Judge, and PEDAR BARTLING, Ass, Attorney, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:13CV3212 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court on a document filed by Plaintiff on October 23, 2014. (See Filing No. 15.) The document is nonsensical, and the court cannot decipher what relief Plaintiff seeks. To the extent Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing this matter without prejudice, his request is denied because Plaintiff has set forth no reason why the court should reconsider any portion of its order.1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: The clerk’s office is directed to term the motion event appearing at Filing Number 15. To the extent Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the court’s Memorandum and Order dated May 21, 2014, his request is denied. DATED this 1st day of December, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/ John M. Gerrard United States District Judge 1 The court dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint on May 21, 2014, because Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint by May 12, 2014. (See Filing No. 13.) Like the document at issue here, Plaintiff’s Complaint is nonsensical and nearly impossible to decipher. *This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?