Nelson v. Skrobecki et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendants Motion to Amend Progression Order (Filing No. 30 ) is denied without prejudice to reassertion of a motion that identifies proposed deadlines for completing discovery and filing dispositive motions. Ordered by Judge John M. Gerrard. (GJG) (Copy mailed to prose party) Modified on 7/8/2015 to add copy mailed to prose party (GJG).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
DENISE SKROBECKI, warden, in
her personal and professional
capacity, STEVE HUNZEKER, unit
administrator, in his personal and
professional capacity, DAMON
BRUBER, unit manager, in his
personal and professional capacity,
and BROOKE BJERRUM, unit
manager, in her personal and
This matter is before the court on Defendants’ Motion to Amend Progression
Order (Filing No. 30). The court’s progression order requires all depositions to be
completed by July 8, 2015. Defendants were scheduled to depose Plaintiff on July 7,
2015, but were unable to complete the deposition because Plaintiff was transported
to Madison County for an emergency hearing in an unrelated case. They ask for the
court to modify its progression order to extend the time in which they have to depose
Plaintiff and file dispositive motions. However, they do not propose any deadlines for
the amended progression order or explain how much time is needed to depose Plaintiff
or when she will return from Madison County. Accordingly,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Defendants Motion to Amend
Progression Order (Filing No. 30) is denied without prejudice to reassertion of a
motion that identifies proposed deadlines for completing discovery and filing
DATED this 8th day of July, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/ John M. Gerrard
United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District
of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they
provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The
court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases
to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?