Carper v. State of Nebraska et al.

Filing 37

ORDER - THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT plaintiffs motion to reconsider, Filing No. 30 , motion to clarify, Filing No. 32 , motion for an assignment of a judge with knowledge on federal Violence Against Women Act Provisions, Filing No. 33 , and motion for Rule 37 enforcement, Filing No. 35 , are all denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(TCL )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JULIE L. CARPER, Plaintiff, 4:14CV3060 v. ORDER MICHAEL G. HEAVICAN, Hon., Chief Justice, Nebraska Supreme Court; and STATE OF NEBRASKA, Defendants. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to reconsider, Filing No. 30, this Court’s order and judgment, Filing Nos. 28 and 29. Plaintiff also files a motion to clarify, Filing No. 32, a motion for an assignment of a judge with knowledge on federal Violence Against Women Act Provisions, Filing No. 33, and motion for Rule 37 enforcement, Filing No. 35. The Court has reviewed each of these motions and finds they are frivolous and without merit. Accordingly, the Court will deny the same. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT plaintiff’s motion to reconsider, Filing No. 30, motion to clarify, Filing No. 32, motion for an assignment of a judge with knowledge on federal Violence Against Women Act Provisions, Filing No. 33, and motion for Rule 37 enforcement, Filing No. 35, are all denied. Dated this 23rd day of January, 2015 BY THE COURT: s/ Joseph F. Bataillon Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?