Brown v. Nebr. Dept. of Correctional Svs.. et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's "Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint" (Filing No. 23 ) is granted. The clerk's office is directed to add the following docket text to the already-existing text at Filing Number 23 : "Court will consider this document supplemental to the amended complaint." Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
PAUL RODREGUIEZ, Case
Manager et al.,
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s “Motion for Leave to File an
Amended Complaint” (Filing No. 23). In accordance with this court’s local rules, the
court will consider Filing Number 23 as supplemental to the original Complaint. See
NECivR 15.1(b) (stating that in pro se cases, the court may consider an amended
pleading as supplemental to the original pleading, rather than as superseding).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiff’s “Motion for Leave to File an
Amended Complaint” (Filing No. 23) is granted. The clerk’s office is directed to add
the following docket text to the already-existing text at Filing Number 23: “Court will
consider this document supplemental to the amended complaint.”
DATED this 12th day of March, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District
of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they
provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The
court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases
to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?