Perez v. MWE Services, Inc.

Filing 81

CONSENT JUDGMENT - Each party shall bear their own costs, fees and other expenses incurred by such party in connection with any stage of the proceeding. Ordered by Judge Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. (GJG)

Download PDF
IN 11IE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA nlOMAS E. PEREZ, ) SECRETARY OF LABOR, ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ) Plaintiff; v. MWE SERIVCES, INC., d/b/a MIDWEST DEMOUTION, JOHN ZAPATA, and KATIE CEDERBUR.O, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACJ'ION FILE NO. 4:1-kv..03073 ) ) ) CONSENTJUDQMENT Plaintiffhaving brought this action against Defendants, MWE Serv.ices_ lnc., dlb'a Midwest Demolition, a c:orporation, and individuals John Zapata and Katie Cederburs. for overtime violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act during lbe time period January 1, 201 l, through September 2, 2013, at a demolition company Defendants own and operate in Lincoln. Nebn11b. Datcmdanll having ep:cd to the entry oftlrls judgment wiahout contest pwsuant to an apcement between the parties, and upon joint motion of the pmtia. for aucxl came shown: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendants MWE Services, Inc. d/b/a Midwest Demolition, a corporalion. John Zapata, individually, and Katie Cedertnq. individually, (the "Defendantsj hereby agree and acknowledge that as a result ofclaims made by Plaintiff'in this lawsuit, Defeod.aots shall pay the total sums of$12S,OOO ia unpaid overtime compensation and $125,000 in liquidated damages for the period January 1, 2011, through September 2, 2013, for the individuals lisled on Appendix A, attached hereto, pursuant to a three-year payment plan agreed to by the CORF/JOOl61l.000l/121756176.I parties, the explicit terms ofwhich the parties have set forth in a scparak: agreemenL IT IS FURTHER ORDERED. ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, nothing in this Judgment affects the rights of any cumml or fonner employees with respect to any claimed violations of the Act for time periods other than the period January I, 2011 through September 2, 2013, and. notwithstanding anything to the contrary, above, nothing in this consent order aball be deemed an admission on the part of Defendants to claims raised by employees for violations of!M Act in this or any futwe litigation. Further. nothing In this Order precludes Plaintifl'fiom enforcing violations ofthe Act against Defendants that occw- after the date of this Older, and nothing in trus Order shall Sept 7, 2016. prevent Defendants from asserting their defenses to such violations. As consideration for such tcnn, Defendants represenl dad they have been In compliance with the overtime requirements of the Act since at least October of2014. IT JS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that each party shall bear their own costs. fees and other expenses incurred by such party in connection with any stage or this proceeding. ~ Dad: Sept. 7, 2016 CORE/JOOIAJ.00021121756176.I Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDOE 2 Entry of thil judgmeat II hereby conseated to: B~ {j;- E ~- Sara • elch Slimon Lcomud Street LLP • 1201 Wllnul Strm. Suite 2900 Kansas City, MO 64106.21SO 181'1.welch@stinson.com ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS COREl.JOOl6n0002/1217S6176.I 3 M. Patricia Smith Solicitor of Labor Christine Z. Hcri .. Regional Solicitor H. Alice Jacks Associate Regional Solicitor Attorney 2300 Main Stm:t Suite 1020 Kansas City, MO 64 r08 (816) 285-7260 (816) 285-7217 (fax) .:.:Jiitkl\. tL:~ ! ;11.~ili~·' wood.lawa.m@dol.gov A1TORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF', THOMAS E. PEREZ THE UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF LABOR CORFJJOOJ6ll0002/J2m6176.J 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?