Stephenson v. Bruno et al
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff shall have 30 days to apprise the Court of his current address. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: December 1, 2014: check for address; dismiss if no update. Ordered by Senior Judge Lyle E. Strom. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
ERIC D. STEPHENSON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
DAVID BRUNO, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________)
4:14CV3097
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on its own motion.
The
Court takes judicial notice of Nebraska Department of
Correctional Services public records, which show that plaintiff
was released from incarceration on October 27, 2014.
See Stutzka
v. McCarville, 420 F.3d 757, 761, n.2 (8th Cir. 2005) (court may
take judicial notice of public records).
Plaintiff has an obligation to keep the Court informed
of his current address at all times.
See NEGenR 1.3(e) and (g)
(requiring pro se parties to adhere to local rules and inform the
court of address changes within 30 days).
This case cannot be
prosecuted in this Court if plaintiff’s whereabouts remain
unknown.
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff shall have 30 days to
apprise the Court of his current address.
Failure to do so will
result in dismissal of this matter without prejudice and without
further notice.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to set a pro
se case management deadline in this case using the following
text:
December 1, 2014: check for address; dismiss if no update.
DATED this 29th day of October, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lyle E. Strom
____________________________
LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge
United States District Court
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?