Baker v. Retelsdorf et al

Filing 43

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Bakers Motion for Reconsideration (Filing No. 32 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
REGINALD G. BAKER,
Plaintiff,
v.
LEIGH ANN RETELSDORF, TOM
RILEY, BRENDA LEUCK, and
RYAN LINDBERG,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

4:14CV3103

MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER

On July 2, 2015, upon review of Baker’s Motion for Reconsideration (Filing
No. 32), the court provided Baker with an opportunity to file an amended complaint.
(Filing No. 36.) The court cautioned Baker that his Motion for Reconsideration would
be dismissed without further notice if he failed to file the amended complaint. To
date, Baker has not filed an amended complaint and the time in which to do so has
long passed.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Baker’s Motion for
Reconsideration (Filing No. 32) is denied.
DATED this 2nd day of November, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
Richard G. Kopf
Senior United States District Judge
*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend,
approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on
their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties
or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or
functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or
directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.