Baker v. Retelsdorf et al

Filing 43

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Bakers Motion for Reconsideration (Filing No. 32 ) is denied. Ordered by Senior Judge Richard G. Kopf. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(GJG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA REGINALD G. BAKER, Plaintiff, v. LEIGH ANN RETELSDORF, TOM RILEY, BRENDA LEUCK, and RYAN LINDBERG, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 4:14CV3103 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER On July 2, 2015, upon review of Baker’s Motion for Reconsideration (Filing No. 32), the court provided Baker with an opportunity to file an amended complaint. (Filing No. 36.) The court cautioned Baker that his Motion for Reconsideration would be dismissed without further notice if he failed to file the amended complaint. To date, Baker has not filed an amended complaint and the time in which to do so has long passed. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Baker’s Motion for Reconsideration (Filing No. 32) is denied. DATED this 2nd day of November, 2015. BY THE COURT: Richard G. Kopf Senior United States District Judge *This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?